Officer civil defense. I see that you took the time to become a brand new member just so you could post a response to attacks on your police department's credibility. Instead of surfing the internet while on duty, it would be more productive to be more pleasant and less like a smart alec. If you had anything to say of meaningful response we implore you to take the time you need that,is not on company time, and post an intellectual debate about the law. Small insignificant quips only solidify my position that, remaining the silent majority does nothing to change the world.

Out of all the readers, you stand alone as making the only smart alec remark. You must be extremely experienced in the law as you eluded to Magisterial School. Will you be attending the ficticious school yourself?
Thanx for your good taste and friendly remarks! I challenge you to post an in depth response to my blogs! Didn't think you could. I rest my case.

Tyou for your comments. There are many Plum citizens that feel that the magistrate has been at her job so long that she is unable to go against the status quo. She is too agreeable with what Plum council passes as ordinances. She could make a stand against ordinances that strip away our right to be free from illegal search and seizures, which my articles have been discussing at great length.

Sometimes power must challenge power to equalize injustices created by the system. Many people feel that justice has not been equally applied across the board. We believe that 16 years is much too long to be in this type of position of power. If the magistrate would come out publicly against the new ordinances robbing citizens of their rights of Due Process as well as giving police the right to make traffic stops without Probable Cause, then we might not be so up in arms. She has not done so, and has had ample time to do so. No disrespect to you or the magistrate.

We wish to know her position on these two issues. We feel it is important, and will be promoting a candidate who publicly speaks out against these unconstitutional attacks on our Plum citizens. If you know her, we would appreciate her input. And we agree with you that U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan did drop the ball when she began chasing Cyril Wecht. She became a political animal and has lost sight of her duties as a US Department of Justice attorney. She also neglected her duties in the Ellerbe State Trooper child shooting case as well. She will be replaced after the Presidential Election.

You logged in to defend bad behavior by Plum police. Does this mean you have a personal connection to the case? Do you find it acceptable to witness tamper in a Federal FBI investigation? You are in the minority of people who would defend the behavior you are attempting to defend, and only a cop, the accused, or friend of the accused would attempt to do so. And there are most of the Plum police that disagree with your premise altogether.

We know of the embarrassment some badcop sadcops have brought to the reputation of the Plum police department. So all of us agree on one thing and it is that there are goodcops and there are badcops. Cops who remain silent while other cops break the law are considered by most to be badcops too, and they struggle constantly with this gut wrenching guilt. It is a shame that goodcops cannot bring their complaints out into the sunshine without dire consequences. Cops that try to bully people, even on blogsites come across as trying to limit free speach. If you are a good cop, then we applaud you, but making excuses for the unprofessional conduct of others will stifle your credibility. If you are a good cop, do you report the inappropriate actions of your fellow officers? Kind of makes it hard to be a good cop when you have to remain silent at threat of the consequences. You mentioned the highest court in the land, the highest court in the land is the Supreme Court, not Federal Circuit court.

In the last 5 years there has been 4 police chiefs in Plum, what is wrong with this picture? You refered to former mayor Schmeck who was harrassed continuously by police officer Schneiderlochner. Officer Schneiderlochner was fired back then in 2001. The Fraternal Order of Police forced Plum to give back Scneiderlochner's job at the threat of a lawsuit. (That also happened in the Johnny Gammage case). Since then Officer Schneiderlochner was arrested by the FBI for witness tampering and interfering with an investigation. He was again fired by Plum council and Chief Payne in 2005 for 13 counts of police misconduct. The officer was admittedly filming an ex girlfriend in a Plum police Cruiser out of his assigned area, getting overtime pay for it. The FBI indictment accused Schneiderlochner of doing so in order to use the film to intimidate his exgirlfriend witness against several Plum Police officers, because she was going to give State's Evidence against several bad plum cops.

Anyone wanting to "get the facts" as you have suggested can do a search at the top right search box of this site with one word... Schneiderlochner... and see what the facts are as reported in the newspapers.

Regardless of the extra marital affairs involved, How can any person, defend these actions? All of this information was in all the Local and National newspapers. Is this the kind of police behavior we find acceptable in Plum?